Amveco
Medical Grade Isolation Transformer
MEDICAL POWER & ISOLATION TRANSFORMERS 50/60Hz
To Order Amveco Transformers We
Recommend TEMCo
Ph:
1-800-613-2290
Or 1-510-490-2187
Link:
Power Transformer |
Lifetime warranty
Customized standards or full custom designs are available at nominal or
zero additional costs.
WINDING CONFIGURATIONS WITH COLOR CODES
Quad Primaries: 100V, 120V, 220V, 240V - 50/60Hz
Multiple primaries must be connected in series or parallel.

NOTE:
(suffix) SS = (Single Secondary) Secondary 1 only
(suffix) DS = (Dual Secondary) Secondary 1 & 2
Units rated below 1000VA come with metal disk and insulating pads.
Units rated 1000VA and larger are center potted.
Part numbers MT100 through MT5000 carry full TUV BAUARTMARK.
|
Part numbers MT100 through MT5000 carry full TUV BAUARTMARK. |
(UL 544, UL 2601, IEC 601, CSA 22.2 NO. 601.1)
RECOGNIZED MEDICAL POWER/ISOLATION TRANSFORMERS
|
|
Nominal
Power VA |
Secondary
Current at 120 V |
Secondary
Current at 240 V |
AxB1 in
Weight
lb. |
AxB1 mm
Weight
kg. |
Part Number |
|
100 |
.83A |
-- |
4.0x2.0
2.7 |
102x51
1.2 |
MT0100SS |
|
100 |
.83A |
.42A |
4.0x2.0
2.7 |
102x51
1.2 |
MT0100DS |
|
230 |
1.92A |
-- |
4.6x2.4
5.2 |
117x61
2.4 |
MT0230SS |
|
230 |
1.92A |
.96A |
4.6x2.4
5.2 |
117x61
2.4 |
MT0230DS |
|
400 |
3.33A |
-- |
5.5x2.5
8.0 |
140x64
3.6 |
MT0400SS |
|
400 |
3.33A |
1.67A |
5 5x2.5
8.0 |
140x64
3.6 |
MT0400DS |
|
600 |
5.00A |
-- |
6.2x3.1
13.0 |
157x79
5.9 |
MT0600SS |
|
600 |
5.00A |
2.5A |
6.2x3.1
13.0 |
157x79
5.9 |
MT0600DS |
|
750 |
6.25A |
-- |
6.6x3.0
14.0 |
168x76
6.4 |
MT0750SS |
|
750 |
6.25A |
3.12A |
6.6x3.1
14.0 |
168x79
6.4 |
MT0750DS |
|
1000 |
8.33A |
4.16A |
6.9x3.5
20.0 |
175x89
9.1 |
MT1000DS |
|
1500 |
12.5A |
6.25A |
8.2x4.0
28 |
208x102
12.7 |
MT1500DS |
|
2000 |
16.6A |
8.33A |
9.1x4.4
35 |
231x112
15.9 |
MT2000DS |
|
2500 |
20.8A |
10.4A |
9.4x4.5
39 |
239x 114
17.7 |
MT2500DS |
|
3000 |
25.0A |
12.5A |
10.0x4.3
47 |
254x109
21.3 |
MT3000DS |
|
3750 |
31.2A |
15.6A |
10.5x4.9
65 |
267x124
29.5 |
MT3750DS |
|
5000 |
41.6A |
20.8A |
11.6x5.4
78 |
295x137
35.4 |
MT5000DS |
|
6250 |
52.0A |
26.0A |
12.0x5.6
90 |
305x143
40.8 |
MT7500DS |
|
7500 |
62.5A |
31.2A |
12.0x5.5
100 |
305x140
45.4 |
MT7500DS |
|
8750 |
72.9A |
36.4A |
12.5x5.5
110 |
318x140
49.9 |
MT8750DS |
|
10000 |
83.3A |
41.6A |
13.0x5.2
120 |
330x132
54.4 |
MT10000DS |
|
The values given are typical values.
Technical data subject to change without prior notice.
Below is a article written by the Medical Device &
Diagnostic Industry Magazine MDDI Article Index
ITE Power Supplies and Medical Equipment
There are potential pitfalls in using ITE power supplies in medical
devices. Knowing applicable standards will help you avoid mistakes.
Frank O'Brien
A large OEM power-supply industry has sprung up to meet the voracious
appetite of the information technology equipment (ITE) market for
global, high-volume, reliable, cost-effective power supplies. These OEM
power supplies are a tempting option for medical equipment manufacturers
as well. However, medical equipment regulatory requirements must also be
met—a crucial design factor that demands caution when one considers an
off-the-shelf ITE power supply for a new device.
In general, ITE and medical equipment share connections to supply mains
and the provision for input/output data connections. In both cases, it's
anticipated that users or operators will have access to equipment
surfaces, and sometimes to data circuits. The primary hazard associated
with this type of access is electrical shock. The power supply plays a
fundamental role in protecting against this hazard.
The primary and obvious difference between ITE and medical equipment is
that medical equipment is intended to diagnose, treat, or monitor a
patient. Therefore, medical equipment normally comes in intentional
contact with the patient: equipment surfaces within the patient vicinity
can be contacted by the patient, or contacted by an operator who is also
contacting the patient. As patients can be unconscious, connected to
multiple equipment, or have open skin regions, the risk of electric
shock can be great. Again, power supplies play an important role in
protecting against an electric shock hazard in such settings.
The primary and obvious difference between ITE and medical equipment is
that medical equipment is intended to diagnose, treat, or monitor a
patient. Therefore, medical equipment normally comes in intentional
contact with the patient: equipment surfaces within the patient vicinity
can be contacted by the patient, or contacted by an operator who is also
contacting the patient. As patients can be unconscious, connected to
multiple equipment, or have open skin regions, the risk of electric
shock can be great. Again, power supplies play an important role in
protecting against an electric shock hazard in such settings.
The intent of this article is to:
Examine the safety requirements for ITE and medical equipment.
Compare their fundamental approaches to protection against electric
shock.
Identify areas in which ITE power supplies may require further
evaluation.
Examine some available options.
Outline ideal safety specifications for medical power supplies.
SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
Information Technology Equipment. Most major world markets
require IT equipment to provide reasonable protection against injury for
users and damage to property. In the United States, regulations from
OSHA and FCC must be met. In Europe, the Low Voltage Directive and the
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Directive must be satisfied.
Compliance with the international safety standard, Safety of Information
Technology Equipment, IEC 60950, 3rd edition (1999-04), is the generally
accepted way to satisfy the safety requirements of markets around the
world. Additional regulations exist for EMC. (EMC requirements are
outside the scope of this article. However, the internationally accepted
standards that largely satisfy global regulations are based on CISPR 22
and CISPR 24.)
Within each national or regional market, the international standard must
be considered together with any published deviations that take into
account local installation codes and expectations of safety. In the
United States and Canada, national deviations are contained in the
binational standard, CSA C22.2 No. 950-95/UL 1950, 3rd edition
(1995-07). This standard is based on IEC 60950, 2nd edition (1991) +
Amendment 1 (1992-02) + Amendment 2 (1993-06) + Amendment 3 (1995-01) +
Amendment 4 (1996-07). UL and CSA are planning to issue an updated
binational standard, based on IEC 60950, 3rd edition, by the first half
of 2000. In Europe, regional deviations are contained in EN 60950 (1992)
+ Amendment 1 (1993) + Amendment 2 (1993) + Amendment 3 (1995) +
Amendment 4 (1997) + Amendment 11 (1997).
Medical Equipment. Most major world markets regulate medical
equipment. In the United States, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (and succeeding acts) requires that all medical devices be "safe and
effective," and FDA recognizes consensus standards as a means to support
a declaration of conformity (new 510(k) paradigm, "abbreviated 510(k)").
FDA lists IEC 60601 + national deviations (UL 2601-1) as a recognized
consensus standard. In Europe, the Medical Devices Directive (93/42/EEC,
Article 3) requires medical devices to meet the "essential
requirements." Compliance is presumed by conformity to the harmonized
standards in the Official Journal of the EC (93/42/EEC, Article 5). IEC
60601 + regional deviations (EN 60601) is a harmonized standard.
Similarly, IEC 60601 forms the basis for national medical equipment
safety standards in many countries, including Japan, Canada, Brazil,
Australia, and South Korea.
IEC 60601 is a series of standards. The basic standard containing the
core safety requirements for all electrical medical equipment is Medical
Electrical Equipment—Part 1 General Requirements for Safety, IEC
60601-1, 2nd edition, (1988-12) + Amendment 1 (1991-11) + Amendment 2
(1995-03). There are collateral (horizontal) standards, which supplement
the core requirements by providing technology-related safety
requirements. The naming convention for collateral standards is IEC
60601-1-xx. Technologies addressed by collateral standards include
medical systems, EMC, x-ray radiation, and programmable systems. There
are also particular (vertical) standards, which supplement the core
requirements by providing device-specific safety and performance
requirements. The naming convention for particular safety standards is
IEC 60601-2-xx. Specific devices addressed by particular standards
include RF surgical devices, ECG monitors, infusion pumps, and hospital
beds. There are approximately 40 Part 2 standards. Although most of
these also include essential performance requirements, the trend is to
move to another (-3-xx) series of standards for essential performance.
Within each national or regional market, the international standard must
be considered together with any published deviations that take into
account local installation codes and expectations of safety. In the
United States, the national deviations to the core safety requirements
are contained in the standard UL 2601-1 (1997-10). In Europe, regional
deviations to the core safety requirements are contained in EN 60601-1
(1991-01) + Amendment 1 (1994-06) + Amendment 2 (1996-03) + Amendment 13
(1996-07).
For EMC, the internationally accepted standards that largely satisfy
global regulations are in IEC 60601-1-2 (1993-04), and are based on
CISPR 11, CISPR 14, and IEC 60801. For some equipment, the FDA reviewer
guidance document for premarket notification (510(k)) submissions
contains EMC recommendations that are not entirely represented by IEC
60601-1-2.
Since the United States and European markets are the largest ones for
medical equipment manufacturers, only the national and regional
standards relevant to those markets were cited above. The remainder of
this article addresses the generic IEC 60950 and IEC 60601-1
requirements. All references are to IEC 60950, 3rd edition (1999-04) and
IEC 60601-1, 2nd edition (1988-12), including all amendments. U. S. and
European deviations do not amend the requirements referenced below.
COMMON SAFETY PHILOSOPHY
When designing a product to provide reasonable protection against injury
and property damage, how safe is safe enough? This is the question that
safety standards address. IEC standards are consensus documents, which
define the minimum design requirements.
As technology advances, device usage evolves, and other factors change,
a standard can become out of date and its requirements no longer
appropriate. Thus, the use of standards does not preclude the need to
conduct a risk analysis on products.
Two Levels of Protection. According to IEC 60950, Sub-clause
1.3.1, "Equipment shall be so designed and constructed that, under all
conditions of normal use and under a likely fault condition, it protects
against risk of personal injury from electric shock and other hazards,
and against serious fire originating in the equipment, within the
meaning of this standard." ITE must be "safe" in normal and likely fault
condition. There are a number of ways to meet this fail-safe
requirement, the most common of which is to design in a backup level of
protection. When employing this strategy, it must also be unlikely that
the failure of the first means of protection will go undetected or
tolerated by the user before a likely fault of the backup protection
occurs. To summarize, a common strategy for designing ITE is to design
in two levels of protection.
In some situations, however, two levels of protection might not be
considered a reasonable level of protection against injury or property
damage. For example, developers of safety requirements for aircraft,
nuclear power plants, or missions to Mars may have other ideas about
what constitutes a reasonable amount of protection. However, the ITE
standard defines two levels of protection as sufficient for ITE.
In a similar manner, IEC 60601-1, Clause 3.1 states that "Equipment
shall, when transported, stored, installed, operated in normal use, and
maintained according to the instructions of the manufacturer, cause no
safety hazard which could reasonably be foreseen and which is not
connected with its intended application, in normal condition and in
single-fault condition." As with ITE, medical equipment must be "safe"
in normal and likely fault condition, and a common strategy for
designing such equipment is to design in two levels of protection.

Table I. Correlation of terminology for IEC 60950 and IEC 60601-1.
COMMON TERMINOLOGY
There is generally a one-to-one correlation of IEC 60950 and IEC 60601-1
terminology. Table I summarizes this mapping, and provides the basis to
discuss both standards with a common language. In this article, the
medical terminology will be used.
PROTECTION AGAINST ELECTRIC SHOCK
At established threshold levels, an electrical current passing through
the body can cause electric shock. This current depends on the voltage
and the body impedance.
Fundamentally, the basic strategies to limit the accessible current, and
therefore protect against electrical shock, are to place high impedance
(insulation) in the current path, or limit the accessible voltage (earthing
or grounding).

Table II. Levels of protection (LOPs) against electrical shock.
As mentioned previously, both IEC 60950 and IEC 60601-1 require two
levels of protection against electrical shock. Both IEC 60950 and IEC
60601-1 define insulation and earthing (grounding) terminology to denote
their role with regard to levels of protective provided. Table II
summarizes the terminology.

Figure 1. (a) Basic insulation plus protective earthing, (b) basic
plus supplementary insulation, and (c) reinforced insulation.
Knowing that the goal is two levels of protection, it becomes clear that
the combination of basic insulation and protective earthing satisfies
this requirement. If the basic insulation fails, the user has access to
a protectively earthed surface. If the protective earthing supply
connection is broken, the basic insulation provides separation (high
impedance) between the live part and the user. This is illustrated in
figure 1a.
Similarly, basic and supplementary insulation will provide two levels of
protection. By definition, this is considered double insulation. This
scheme is illustrated in figure 1b.
Reinforced insulation is a single system that has been shown to provide
the equivalent of two levels of protection, as shown in figure 1c. By
definition, it is considered more than a single fault for reinforced
insulation to fail.
Looking at the levels of protection provided by the insulation types,
one might wonder if two means of basic insulation could be considered as
providing two levels of protection. However, basic insulation by
definition is not intended to be a backup means of protection. This role
is reserved for supplementary insulation (or protective earthing).

Figure 2. Protective earth (1 LOP).
For earthing to provide a level of protection against electric shock,
it's important that the earthing connection have a sufficiently high
current-carrying capacity and low impedance. In the event of a failure
of basic insulation, the earthing connection must remain intact at least
until the branch protection clears (high current), and the accessible
surfaces must remain at or near earth potential (low impedance). Figure
2 illustrates this principal. Earthing that has not been evaluated for
these properties is by definition functional earthing. Earthing provided
for EMC shielding purposes is an example of earthing that may not need
to be evaluated as protective earthing.
When considering the suitability of insulation, it's important to
consider the voltage stress the insulation is subjected to under normal
use, which is defined as the reference voltage. IEC 60601-1, Clause 20.3
specifies, "For insulation between two isolated parts or between an
isolated part and an earthed part, the reference voltage (U) is equal to
the arithmetic sum of the highest voltages between any two points within
both parts." In the case in which both parts share a common earth
reference, the reference voltage is the higher of the voltage in either
of the two parts. With IEC 60950, these same requirements must be
considered as well as voltage peak values. In the case of switching
power supplies, repetitive peak voltages are common. (The consequence
this can have on air clearances required by IEC 60950 is presented in
more detail when air clearances are discussed below.)
Insulation diagrams (sometimes called isolation diagrams) are used in
product design to graphically:
Identify insulation types, reference voltages, and earthing types.
Determine required creepage, clearance, and transformer-layer insulation
thickness (physical requirements).
Determine required dielectric-strength values (test requirement).
Identify alternative constructions.
Convey design criteria to purchasing staff, vendors, and others.
Figure 3 illustrates a simple insulation diagram for a product with a
supply mains connection, a protectively earthed (PE) enclosure, and a
SIP/SOP (ITE SELV) data connection. The mains circuit is considered a
mains part (MP); the SIP/SOP circuit is considered a live part (LP).
Bridging the mains part and the live part is the power supply (P/S).
Shown is an insulation and earthing scheme that provides two levels of
protection against electric shock: from MP to PE is basic insulation,
and from MP to LP is double or reinforced insulation. The SIP/SOP is
tied to earth (FE), as is common with ITE. This is acceptable in medical
equipment in cases when separation requirements in IEC 60601-1 Clause
17(g)2 and accessibility requirements in Clause 16(a)5 or 16(e) are met.
Since the SIP/SOP is connected to functional earth, the reference
voltage from mains part to SIP/SOP is the mains voltage.

Figure 3. Insulation diagram for a typical medical product
(neglecting AP).
POSSIBLE PITFALLS USING ITE POWER SUPPLIES
Knowing which insulation types, reference voltages, and earthing types
are required by a product design has physical construction and test
consequences. Insulation types are evaluated by examining physical
distances (creepage and clearance) and, in some cases, checking
insulation thicknesses (transformer layer insulation). Insulation
materials provided in lieu of physical air separation are tested for
dielectric strength. All distances and insulation thicknesses are
evaluated with leakage current measurements. The following section
examines each of the insulation requirements in more detail.

Table III. Comparison of creepage, clearance, and dielectric-strength
requirements.
Creepage and Clearance. Taking the insulation types and reference
voltages determined as necessary in the simple insulation diagram, we
can look up the creepage and clearance distance requirements. IEC
60601-1 specifies creepage and clearance requirements in Clause 57.10.
Table III shows these distances for both medical equipment (IEC 60601-1)
and ITE (IEC 60950). For ITE, we've assumed typical Installation
Category II, Pollution Degree 2, and Material Group IIIb. Air-clearance
requirements specified by IEC 60950 include a component dependent on
maximum repetitive peak voltages, whereas air clearances specified by
IEC 60601-1 do not. Repetitive peak voltages are common in switching
power supplies. Table III assumes that any repetitive peak voltages do
not exceed 420 V. Should repetitive peak voltages exceed 420 V—and this
is possible with today's switching power supplies—repetitive peak
voltages of 787 V must be present before the clearance requirement of
IEC 60950 equals the 5-mm requirement of IEC 60601-1. Repetitive peak
voltages higher than 787 V are rare in today's switching power supplies.
As shown in Table III, in all cases creepage and clearance distances
required by IEC 60601-1 are greater than those required by IEC 60950.
This does not mean that ITE power supplies are unacceptable in all
medical devices, but rather they have not been validated as complying
with IEC 60601-1. The medical device manufacturer must do this
validation.

Figure 4. Creepage and air clearance distances.
First, let's review what creepage and clearance distances are. Creepage
distance (CR) is the shortest path along the surface of insulating
material between two conductive parts (sometimes called over-surface
spacing), while air-clearance distance (CL) is the shortest path in air
between two conductive parts (sometimes called through-air spacing).
Creepage and clearance are illustrated in figure 4.

Figure 5. Circuit blocks.
Next, let's review how the circuit blocks of the insulation diagram map
to an actual product. Consider the product represented by the schematic
in figure 5. This is a product with a mains-connected motor. There is a
mains-connected transformer that supplies low-voltage secondary power
for control circuitry. The SIP/SIP connection might be for a foot-switch
control that activates the solid-state relay and therefore the motor.
The product could be, for example, a smoke-evacuation device used to
assist with RF surgical procedures.
Notice that there is a single mains part circuit block, a protectively
earthed enclosure, and a SIP/SOP circuit block, mapping exactly what is
illustrated in figure 3. The primary advantage to insulation diagrams is
that they provide a layer of abstraction above the details of the
product and allow one to focus on the insulation and earthing
requirements.
When considering whether the required basic insulation requirements from
mains to earth are met for the smoke-evacuator example shown in figure
5, it's clear we need to consider such components as an appliance inlet,
fuse holders, Y capacitors, transformer (core-earthed), motor
(enclosure-earthed), printed wiring board, and wire insulation. To
verify the required double- or reinforced-insulation requirements from
mains to SIP/SOP for the same device, we must consider such components
as the transformer, opto-coupler, relay, printed wiring board, and wire
insulation.

Figure 6. Printed wiring board example.
Figure 6 illustrates exactly what creepage measurements are needed in
order to validate that the requirements are met. With the components
mounted on the board, clearance distances will need to be measured. If
this printed wiring board was designed to meet the minimum requirements
of IEC 60950, the required IEC 60601-1 distances may not be provided.

Table IV. Comparison of transformer layer insulation requirements.
Transformer Layer Insulation. The transformer layer insulation
requirements for medical equipment can be found in IEC 60601-1, Clause
57.9.4e. Table IV shows the transformer layer insulation requirements
for medical equipment alongside the solid insulation requirements for
ITE (IEC 60950). As can be seen in the table, for reinforced insulation
the IEC 60601-1 transformer layer insulation requirements are not
represented by IEC 60950 requirements. The medical device manufacturer
must validate that the transformer meets IEC 60601-1 requirements and
not the minimum requirements of IEC 60950.

Figure 7. Cross section of transformer layer insulation, showing a
bobbin with insulating partition.
As an example, let's consider two common transformer constructions. The
first is a transformer with a center flange bobbin, which is common for
linear transformers. A cross-sectional view of such a transformer is
shown in figure 7. For a medical device, the thickness of the center
flange must be a minimum of 1 mm (single material).
The second construction is a concentrically wound transformer, which is
common in switching power supplies; figure 8 shows cross-sectional views
from the top and side. We must validate that the insulation material
between primary (mains) and secondary (SIP/SIP) windings meet the
transformer layer requirements. Because two layers of insulating
material will normally be less than 0.3 mm, this typically requires
validating that at least three layers of insulating material are
provided.

Figure 8. Transformer layer insulation, showing a bobbin with
insulating tape.

Figure 9. Transformer creepage, showing a bobbin with insulating
tape.
The concentrically wound transformer provides an excellent example of an
important creepage distance that must be considered. Figure 9 shows
where the primary-to-secondary insulation butts up against the bobbin
end flanges. This joint is considered an uncemented joint, and the
distance between primary and secondary end turns needs to meet the
creepage distance requirements, with one special allowance in that the
enamel coating on the primary and secondary windings contributes 1 mm
each towards the required creepage distance. Shown in figure 9 is a
margin tape of width W, which provides positive end-turn retention and
maintains the minimum required creepage distance. For IEC 60601-1, the
width W will need to be at least 3 mm in order to meet an 8-mm creepage
distance requirement after taking into account the 2-mm contribution of
the enameled windings. For IEC 60950, W will need to be at least 2.5 mm
to meet a 5-mm requirement, since for IEC 60950 the enamel on windings
contributes nothing to creepage distances. In addition, creepage
distances from winding end turns to opposite winding exit leads must be
considered.

Figure 10. Example of a concentrically wound transformer.
Figure 10 illustrates a concentrically wound transformer and the type of
disassembly and activities that are needed in order to validate that the
transformer's construction complies with insulation requirements.
Dielectric Strength. IEC 60601-1, Clause 20 outlines the
dielectric-strength requirements for medical equipment. Table III shows
these dielectric-strength requirements for medical equipment alongside
those for ITE (IEC 60950).
As Table III illustrates, the IEC 60601-1 dielectric-strength
requirement of 1.5 kV for basic insulation with a reference voltage of
240 V ac is the same as that in IEC 60950. However, for reinforced
insulation, the IEC 60601-1 dielectric strength requirement of 4 kV is
larger than the IEC 60950 requirements of 3 kV. The medical device
manufacturer must validate that the transformer meets IEC 60601-1
requirements from mains to SIP/SOP and not the minimum requirements of
IEC 60950. In order to do this, a test voltage with the same waveform
and frequency is applied across the insulation under test. Initially,
not more than half the prescribed voltage is applied, then it is
gradually raised over a period of 10 seconds to the full value, and
maintained for 1 minute. This is illustrated in Figure 11.

Figure 11. Dielectric-strength test. Double or reinforced insulation
normally needs to be tested separately.
A practical issue with testing reinforced insulation by applying the
test voltage on the whole product is that there can also be parallel
paths of insulation that require a less-stringent test voltage due to
assistance from protective earthing. For example, consider the product
illustrated in Figures 3 and 5. If an external test voltage of 4000 V ac
is applied from mains to SIP/SOP, there are three paths being stressed,
of which only two require reinforced insulation. The first is the mains
transformer, which needs the 4000-V-ac test. The second is the
solid-state relay, which also needs the 4000-V-ac test. The third is the
combination of the Y capacitors—which are required to comply with a test
voltage of 1500 V ac (basic insulation for 240 V ac)—and the functional
earthing connection between the enclosure and the SIP/SOP circuitry. It
is this third path that might reveal a false-negative test result. In
order to conduct a dielectric-strength test on only the components
requiring the test voltage, it's often necessary to test the components
separately from the product. In this example, it is acceptable—and in
fact prudent—to remove the mains transformer and solid-state relay from
the product and test them separately.
Leakage Current. Leakage current can be defined as all currents,
including capacitively coupled currents, that can be conveyed between
exposed conductive surfaces and earth or other exposed conductive
surfaces.1 Specifically, earth leakage current is current flowing from
the mains part through or across insulation into the protective earth
supply connection. Enclosure leakage current is current flowing from the
enclosure to the operator or patient, with the operator or patient
referenced to earth or to another part of the enclosure. One common
source of leakage current is EMC filtering components.

Table V. Comparison of leakage current requirements.
Leakage current should be kept within acceptable limits for protection
against electric shock. Leakage current requirements for medical
equipment are specified in IEC 60601-1, Clause 19, where limits are
detailed for normal and single-fault conditions. Table V shows the
leakage current requirements for medical equipment alongside those for
ITE (IEC 60950).
As shown in Table V, IEC 60601-1 leakage current requirements are not
represented by IEC 60950 requirements. Because patients can be
unconscious, connected to multiple equipment, or have open skin regions
(which lowers body impedance), the lower limits in IEC 60601-1 are
considered appropriate for medical equipment.

Figure 12. Earth leakage current test circuit.

Figure 13. Enclosure leakage current test circuit.
Device manufacturers must validate that any medical product employing an
ITE power supply meets IEC 60601-1 leakage current requirements. This is
accomplished by following the test procedures outlined in Clause 19. The
product is connected to a supply mains voltage of 110% of rating. The
human body impedance of the operator or patient is simulated with a
measuring device (MD) of nominally 1000 ‡ impedance (nominally 2000 ‡,
IEC 60950). Leakage current measurements are made under normal and
single-fault conditions. Switches are provided in the supply circuit to
simulate reverse polarity, S5; a supply conductor opening, S1; and the
protective-earthing supply conductor opening, S7. The opening of S1 or
S7 is considered a single-fault condition. Only one single fault can be
simulated at a time. Figures 12 and 13 illustrate the test circuits for
earth leakage and enclosure leakage current measurements, respectively.
Required as well—though beyond the scope of this article—are patient
leakage current and patient auxiliary leakage current tests.
Summary of Possible Pitfalls. As the preceding review shows, if
an ITE power supply is being relied on to provide basic insulation from
mains to an earthed enclosure and/or double or reinforced insulation
from mains to SIP/SOP, an evaluation must be done to determine whether
the ITE power supply complies with IEC 60601-1 requirements. This
evaluation must include:
An examination of creepage and clearance.
An examination of transformer layer insulation.
Testing of dielectric strength.
Testing of leakage current.
There are other requirements that IEC 60601-1 mandates but IEC 60950
does not. These requirements include, but are not limited to, the
following:
Two fuses for Class I equipment (Clause 57.6).
In some cases, basic opposite polarity distances (20.2 A—f, 57.10.b).
In some cases, additional transformer construction and abnormal testing
(57.9).
Humidity conditioning (4.10, 44.5).
As indicated in IEC 60601-1, Appendix A, the rationale for why many of
the requirements for protection against electric shock are more
stringent in IEC 60601-1 than in IEC 60950 include:
Absence of normal reactions in a patient who may be ill, unconscious,
anesthetized, immobilized, or incapacitated in some other way.
Absence of normal protection to current provided by the patient's skin,
if the skin is penetrated or treated to obtain a low skin resistance.
The simultaneous connection of the patient to more than one piece of
equipment.
The application of electrical circuits directly to the human body,
either through contacts to the skin and/or through the insertion of
probes into internal organs.
OPTIONS FOR OVERCOMING SOME INCOMPATABILITIES
Isolating Transformer, Earthed Secondary. Many medical products employ
an isolation transformer in the mains circuit, in which case the
secondary winding then supplies all internal circuitry for the product.
Let's consider first an isolation transformer with the secondary tied
back to protective earth. The ITE power supply is supplied from the
isolated, earthed secondary winding. We'll assume a secondary voltage of
120 V ac, and that the ITE power supply has been evaluated to IEC 60950
for 240 V ac.

Figure 14. Isolated secondary tied to protective earth.
Figure 14 shows an insulation diagram for such a product. Since the
120-V secondary is earth referenced, the ITE power supply needs
insulation much as if it was located in the mains, except that now the
reference voltage is 120 V ac. The power supply will need to be checked
for compliance with creepage requirements.
Table IV shows the transformer layer insulation requirements. In the
case of single or double layers, the transformer will need to be checked
for compliance. In the case of three layers, since the reference voltage
is 120 V, a 3000-V test is required on two layers, and since this is the
same requirement as in IEC 60950, no further evaluation will be needed.
As Table III shows, the dielectric-strength requirements are the same in
both standards; so no further evaluation is needed.
The leakage-current requirements are represented in Table V.
Leakage-current testing will be needed, although the earth and enclosure
leakage is likely to be low since the power supply's leakage current is
referenced to the secondary of the isolation transformer.
To summarize, the power supply must be checked for compliance with the
IEC 60601-1 requirements for creepage, transformer layer insulation, and
leakage current.
Isolating Transformer, Floating Secondary. Let's consider the same
product, except this time with the isolated secondary floating from
earth. Figure 15 shows an insulation diagram for such a product. Because
the 120-V secondary is floating, both sides of the 120-V circuit must be
accessible for it to be an electrical shock hazard. Providing basic
insulation for 120 V from the secondary to the enclosure and
supplementary insulation for 120 V from the secondary to the SIP/SOP
creates a situation in which two faults would be needed in order to have
both sides of the 120-V secondary accessible.
This protection scheme provides a good opportunity to explain why it may
be important to have the occurrence of a fault detectable by the user.
In this example, the failure of either the basic or supplementary
insulation may not be obvious to the user. The safety of the product
then relies on a single level of protection, and is therefore
diminished. An isolation monitor with an alarm or a periodic maintenance
program that checks for changes in leakage current are examples of
fault-detection techniques that could be appropriate for a product
employing this design. This is not something required by IEC 60601-1,
but might be considered appropriate as a result of a manufacturer's risk
analysis.
A comparison of creepage and clearance requirements in IEC 60601-1 and
IEC 60950 is shown in Table III. Creepage distances to chassis will also
need to be checked. Because the transformer is not relied on for
reinforced insulation, there are no transformer layer requirements
(Table IV).
Table III also shows the dielectric-strength requirements, for which no
further evaluation is needed. Testing for leakage will be needed, but
because the isolated secondary is floating, the leakage currents are
expected to be low (Table V).
Thus, for this configuration, the power supply only must be checked for
compliance with IEC 60601-1 requirements for creepage and leakage
current.

Figure 15. Isolated secondary floating from protective earth.

Figure 16. Data-separation PWB.
Data-Separation Device. Let's consider the ITE power supply in the
240-V-ac mains. This time, we'll rely on the mains isolation only for
supplementary isolation and provide a basic insulation barrier between
the ITE power supply outputs and the SIP/SOP circuits. An insulation
diagram for such a design is shown in Figure 16.
As Table III shows, the creepage and clearance distances to the chassis
will need to be checked. Once again, because the transformer is not
relied on for reinforced insulation, there are no transformer layer
requirements (Table V). No further evaluation is needed of the
dielectric-strength requirements (Table III). The leakage requirements
(Table V) will need to be tested; modifications to the input EMC filter
stage might overcome any problems encountered.
Thus, for the data-separation configuration, the power supply only must
be checked for compliance with the IEC 60601-1 requirements for creepage
and clearance and leakage current.
CONCLUSION
Using ITE power supplies in medical equipment requires additional
measurements and testing that may reveal areas of noncompliance. By
specifying IEC 60601-1 power supplies, manufacturers can greatly
facilitate validating that their medical equipment complies with IEC
60601-1.
Ideally, the following should be included in the power supply
specification:
Compliance with Medical Electrical Equipment—Part 1 General Requirements
for Safety, IEC 60601-1, 2nd edition, (1988-12) + Amendment 1 (1991-11)
+ Amendment 2 (1995-03) + national/regional deviations as needed.
Environment conditions specified in IEC 60601-1, Clause 10.2.1, or
higher, if needed.
A ±10% supply mains tolerance.
Electrical ratings.
Insulation type and nominal reference voltage needed from input to
output(s) (only the vendor will know the specific reference voltage,
based on design).
Insulation type and nominal reference voltage needed from input to
chassis.
Any third-party certification marks and/or test reports required.
Power Transformer Information:
|
 
Power Transformer Types
 |
Step Up and Step Down Transformers
to Power transformers to step-up ( raise) or step-down (lower) the
electrical voltage.
|
 |
Isolation Transformers
allows signal or power to be taken from one device and fed into
another without electrically connecting the two.
|
 |
Toroidal Transformers
are devices that transfer electrical energy from one electric
circuit to another, without changing the frequency, by
electromagnetic induction.
|

|
Custom
Transformers
are designed to meet certain performance specifications and size
requirement that you require. There is a wide range of custom
transformer types.
|

|
Buck Boost Transformers
is a ideal solution for changing line voltage by small amounts.
Often used to buck (lower), or boost (raise) the voltage from 208v
to 240v for lighting applications.
|

|
Pole Mounted Transformers
are mounted to poles for overhead electrical lines. Used in various applications.
Are available in single phase or three phase transformers.
|

|
Medium Voltage Transformers
are used with a medium range of voltages. They come in a full
range from liquid-filled, convention dry type as well as cast coil.
|
 |
Pad Mounted Transformers
are a excellent choice for commercial and industrial such as
manufacturing facilities, refineries, office buildings, schools,
hospitals, restaurants, and retail stores. They come in various
sizes and can be used underground as well.
|
 |
High
Voltage Transformers
typically these voltage transformers are used in power transmission
applications. High voltage transformers are also used in microwave.
|
|